Buffalo_Ken · 2026-08-11T17:31:27Z Bottom line I declare - place your bets! Israel as it exists presently is toast - toast it is cause it is out of favor... and that is FATAL . ~ Good riddance zigaboos - may you reap what yee sow.... may you get the justice deserved! ~ May the spirits aplenty arise out of Gaza and turn the tables upon you pompous ones - for whom ~ Justified Retribution is called. ~ May they turn the tides upon thee pompous ones for whom justice beckons. ~ BK Poem of the Day, 81126 1331
Buffalo_Ken · 2026-08-11T17:31:27Z
Bottom line I declare - place your bets! Israel as it exists presently is toast - toast it is cause it is out of favor... and that is FATAL . ~ Good riddance zigaboos - may you reap what yee sow.... may you get the justice deserved! ~ May the spirits aplenty arise out of Gaza and turn the tables upon you pompous ones - for whom ~ Justified Retribution is called. ~ May they turn the tides upon thee pompous ones for whom justice beckons. ~ BK Poem of the Day, 81126 1331
Buffalo_Ken · 2026-08-11T17:45:36Z OK - here we are 16 minutes 42 seconds into it - and it is admitted or stated at least - China is the one been covering the gap in oil supplies - and fair question to ask is why? How does that help China. I mean just today I read an article Iran is ready to go till Trump gets replaced - cause obviously and evidently and with good reason Iran refuses to negotiate with proven liars - duh..... Tis obvious - so who is China protecting while they ameliorate the loss of oil supply - to the benefit of the us of a to a point evidently - and maybe now tis time to stop that - and demand some supply from the Middle East and let it be provided - assuming you pay the transit fee. ~ You can't have it both ways - and the time for pussy-footing around is over. The time for Justified Retribution is literally NOW. And Israel has a high price to pay - if the zigaboos don't pay it, then let them perish. If they do pay it - let them perish either way. You see - they are in the corner of their own making - and they will perish there either way. They assure it - by virtue of how they have treated the innocence in Gaza. It is evident and obvious. Make your choice.
Buffalo_Ken · 2026-08-11T17:45:36Z
OK - here we are 16 minutes 42 seconds into it - and it is admitted or stated at least - China is the one been covering the gap in oil supplies - and fair question to ask is why? How does that help China. I mean just today I read an article Iran is ready to go till Trump gets replaced - cause obviously and evidently and with good reason Iran refuses to negotiate with proven liars - duh..... Tis obvious - so who is China protecting while they ameliorate the loss of oil supply - to the benefit of the us of a to a point evidently - and maybe now tis time to stop that - and demand some supply from the Middle East and let it be provided - assuming you pay the transit fee. ~ You can't have it both ways - and the time for pussy-footing around is over. The time for Justified Retribution is literally NOW. And Israel has a high price to pay - if the zigaboos don't pay it, then let them perish. If they do pay it - let them perish either way. You see - they are in the corner of their own making - and they will perish there either way. They assure it - by virtue of how they have treated the innocence in Gaza. It is evident and obvious. Make your choice.
TBoris · 2026-08-11T22:36:45Z Instead of Alex Jones and Prison Planet consider this from Unlimited Hangout by Iain Davis', 'The Praxian Genocidal Kill Chain — Part 2' [ Link ] Speaking recently at the Russian International Affairs Council, the RIAC board of trustees chair, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, said [ Link ] "We are at the high point of the efforts to restructure the world order, which we hope will lead to a stable and just multipolar world. So far, however, the restructuring looks more like a breakdown in every sense of the word . The fight for the leading positions in the new world is extremely intense, nothing less than a fight for survival. [. . .] [A] situation is emerging where the West, with its insatiable hegemonic ambitions, has entered the clinch with the World Majority’s [BRICS] aspiration to [implement] the principles of the UN Charter." The “ breakdown ” to which Lavrov refers is the aforementioned “creative destruction.” A global upheaval similar to the chaos that followed the 1967 Six-Day War—see part 1 [ Link ] disrupting the Middle East again, this time fomented with the assistance of the Praxians[see part 1 again]. The results are new geopolitical structures and a total reappraisal of international relations. (In Part 3 [ Link ] we’ll examine the purportedly new but actually long-planned energy corridors, the reconfigured international supply chains, and the new monetary systems that have now supposedly become a pressing necessity as a result of the Iran “war” SCAD[State Crimes Against Democracy defined in the start of part 3] .) For the international oligarchy that stands to benefit most from the accelerated virtual and physical infrastructure transformation, war continues to be the gift that just keeps on giving. Yes, innocent human beings are being slaughtered in the process, but transnational capital knows no morality. Lavrov confined his remarks to the seeming geopolitical schism. On one side, he posited, are the Western powers; on the other, the BRICS-aligned partnerships of nations that Lavrov referred to as the “World Majority” — which it actually is . Lavrov’s avowed opinion is that the West is seeking more hegemony and that the “World Majority” is allegedly opposing that hegemony by defending the sovereign equality of nations and by aligning itself with the UN Charter in its strict observance of international law. Lavrov’s view has found favour with those whom Geopolitics and Empire’s Morić calls “the Multipolaristas.” These analysts, researchers, and commentators may not intentionally be of the same mind, but they all find hope in the surface-level narratives sold by political heavyweights like Lavrov. For instance, Matthew Ehret, director of the Rising Tide Foundation, has written: [ Link ] "The question is now: will the new world system take the form of a new era of global empire, unmitigated war between faiths and a prolonged dark age OR might it take the form of the beautiful multi-polar world order defined by win-win cooperation between all of the nations, faiths and cultures of the world?" At first glance, Lavrov’s official public value proposition, welcomed by Ehret and other Multipolaristas, appears to have merit. It is true that for too long, under the sole superpower United States, successive US governments and US-aligned governments (notably in Europe and Israel) have waged US-backed wars (either directly or by proxy) with impunity. These wars have been prosecuted simply to achieve whatever foreign policy objectives the US is pursuing at the time. There is nothing admirable or humanitarian in the violent, militarized US hegemony characterizing what Charles Krauthammer called [ Link ] the “unipolar” world . That is a fair assessment. But the Multipolaristas’ superficial analysis breaks down when they presume that unipolarity’s replacement, multipolarity, promises something better. Perhaps, in their understandable eagerness to see the demise of the unipolar world order, the Multipolaristas have overlooked more than a century of documented historical evidence [ Link ] demonstrating that the transnational capitalist engineers of the unipolar world order are also the architects of its successor, the multipolar world order . As we discussed in Part 1 [ Link ] transnational capitalists, such as the Praxian oligarchy, are exactly that: transnational. They may profess allegiance to host nation-states, but in truth they have none. Hopping from the backs of one exploited populace onto the backs of another is an oligarch business growth strategy, and the goal of all that “hopping” is monopoly. Although it is important to see the competition between nations through the lens of realpolitik, to restrict that reading solely to the actions of governments, as if the public sector were independent of the private sector, is to fundamentally misunderstand how multinational power operates and who wields it: [ Link ]
Instead of Alex Jones and Prison Planet consider this from Unlimited Hangout by Iain Davis', 'The Praxian Genocidal Kill Chain — Part 2' [ Link ] Speaking recently at the Russian International Affairs Council, the RIAC board of trustees chair, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, said [ Link ] "We are at the high point of the efforts to restructure the world order, which we hope will lead to a stable and just multipolar world. So far, however, the restructuring looks more like a breakdown in every sense of the word . The fight for the leading positions in the new world is extremely intense, nothing less than a fight for survival. [. . .] [A] situation is emerging where the West, with its insatiable hegemonic ambitions, has entered the clinch with the World Majority’s [BRICS] aspiration to [implement] the principles of the UN Charter." The “ breakdown ” to which Lavrov refers is the aforementioned “creative destruction.” A global upheaval similar to the chaos that followed the 1967 Six-Day War—see part 1 [ Link ] disrupting the Middle East again, this time fomented with the assistance of the Praxians[see part 1 again]. The results are new geopolitical structures and a total reappraisal of international relations. (In Part 3 [ Link ] we’ll examine the purportedly new but actually long-planned energy corridors, the reconfigured international supply chains, and the new monetary systems that have now supposedly become a pressing necessity as a result of the Iran “war” SCAD[State Crimes Against Democracy defined in the start of part 3] .) For the international oligarchy that stands to benefit most from the accelerated virtual and physical infrastructure transformation, war continues to be the gift that just keeps on giving. Yes, innocent human beings are being slaughtered in the process, but transnational capital knows no morality. Lavrov confined his remarks to the seeming geopolitical schism. On one side, he posited, are the Western powers; on the other, the BRICS-aligned partnerships of nations that Lavrov referred to as the “World Majority” — which it actually is . Lavrov’s avowed opinion is that the West is seeking more hegemony and that the “World Majority” is allegedly opposing that hegemony by defending the sovereign equality of nations and by aligning itself with the UN Charter in its strict observance of international law. Lavrov’s view has found favour with those whom Geopolitics and Empire’s Morić calls “the Multipolaristas.” These analysts, researchers, and commentators may not intentionally be of the same mind, but they all find hope in the surface-level narratives sold by political heavyweights like Lavrov. For instance, Matthew Ehret, director of the Rising Tide Foundation, has written: [ Link ] "The question is now: will the new world system take the form of a new era of global empire, unmitigated war between faiths and a prolonged dark age OR might it take the form of the beautiful multi-polar world order defined by win-win cooperation between all of the nations, faiths and cultures of the world?" At first glance, Lavrov’s official public value proposition, welcomed by Ehret and other Multipolaristas, appears to have merit. It is true that for too long, under the sole superpower United States, successive US governments and US-aligned governments (notably in Europe and Israel) have waged US-backed wars (either directly or by proxy) with impunity. These wars have been prosecuted simply to achieve whatever foreign policy objectives the US is pursuing at the time. There is nothing admirable or humanitarian in the violent, militarized US hegemony characterizing what Charles Krauthammer called [ Link ] the “unipolar” world . That is a fair assessment. But the Multipolaristas’ superficial analysis breaks down when they presume that unipolarity’s replacement, multipolarity, promises something better. Perhaps, in their understandable eagerness to see the demise of the unipolar world order, the Multipolaristas have overlooked more than a century of documented historical evidence [ Link ] demonstrating that the transnational capitalist engineers of the unipolar world order are also the architects of its successor, the multipolar world order . As we discussed in Part 1 [ Link ] transnational capitalists, such as the Praxian oligarchy, are exactly that: transnational. They may profess allegiance to host nation-states, but in truth they have none. Hopping from the backs of one exploited populace onto the backs of another is an oligarch business growth strategy, and the goal of all that “hopping” is monopoly. Although it is important to see the competition between nations through the lens of realpolitik, to restrict that reading solely to the actions of governments, as if the public sector were independent of the private sector, is to fundamentally misunderstand how multinational power operates and who wields it: [ Link ]
Speaking recently at the Russian International Affairs Council, the RIAC board of trustees chair, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, said [ Link ]
"We are at the high point of the efforts to restructure the world order, which we hope will lead to a stable and just multipolar world. So far, however, the restructuring looks more like a breakdown in every sense of the word . The fight for the leading positions in the new world is extremely intense, nothing less than a fight for survival. [. . .] [A] situation is emerging where the West, with its insatiable hegemonic ambitions, has entered the clinch with the World Majority’s [BRICS] aspiration to [implement] the principles of the UN Charter."
The “ breakdown ” to which Lavrov refers is the aforementioned “creative destruction.” A global upheaval similar to the chaos that followed the 1967 Six-Day War—see part 1 [ Link ] disrupting the Middle East again, this time fomented with the assistance of the Praxians[see part 1 again].
The results are new geopolitical structures and a total reappraisal of international relations. (In Part 3 [ Link ] we’ll examine the purportedly new but actually long-planned energy corridors, the reconfigured international supply chains, and the new monetary systems that have now supposedly become a pressing necessity as a result of the Iran “war” SCAD[State Crimes Against Democracy defined in the start of part 3] .)
For the international oligarchy that stands to benefit most from the accelerated virtual and physical infrastructure transformation, war continues to be the gift that just keeps on giving. Yes, innocent human beings are being slaughtered in the process, but transnational capital knows no morality.
Lavrov confined his remarks to the seeming geopolitical schism. On one side, he posited, are the Western powers; on the other, the BRICS-aligned partnerships of nations that Lavrov referred to as the “World Majority” — which it actually is . Lavrov’s avowed opinion is that the West is seeking more hegemony and that the “World Majority” is allegedly opposing that hegemony by defending the sovereign equality of nations and by aligning itself with the UN Charter in its strict observance of international law.
Lavrov’s view has found favour with those whom Geopolitics and Empire’s Morić calls “the Multipolaristas.” These analysts, researchers, and commentators may not intentionally be of the same mind, but they all find hope in the surface-level narratives sold by political heavyweights like Lavrov. For instance, Matthew Ehret, director of the Rising Tide Foundation, has written: [ Link ]
"The question is now: will the new world system take the form of a new era of global empire, unmitigated war between faiths and a prolonged dark age OR might it take the form of the beautiful multi-polar world order defined by win-win cooperation between all of the nations, faiths and cultures of the world?"
At first glance, Lavrov’s official public value proposition, welcomed by Ehret and other Multipolaristas, appears to have merit. It is true that for too long, under the sole superpower United States, successive US governments and US-aligned governments (notably in Europe and Israel) have waged US-backed wars (either directly or by proxy) with impunity. These wars have been prosecuted simply to achieve whatever foreign policy objectives the US is pursuing at the time. There is nothing admirable or humanitarian in the violent, militarized US hegemony characterizing what Charles Krauthammer called [ Link ] the “unipolar” world .
That is a fair assessment. But the Multipolaristas’ superficial analysis breaks down when they presume that unipolarity’s replacement, multipolarity, promises something better.
Perhaps, in their understandable eagerness to see the demise of the unipolar world order, the Multipolaristas have overlooked more than a century of documented historical evidence [ Link ] demonstrating that the transnational capitalist engineers of the unipolar world order are also the architects of its successor, the multipolar world order .
As we discussed in Part 1 [ Link ] transnational capitalists, such as the Praxian oligarchy, are exactly that: transnational. They may profess allegiance to host nation-states, but in truth they have none. Hopping from the backs of one exploited populace onto the backs of another is an oligarch business growth strategy, and the goal of all that “hopping” is monopoly. Although it is important to see the competition between nations through the lens of realpolitik, to restrict that reading solely to the actions of governments, as if the public sector were independent of the private sector, is to fundamentally misunderstand how multinational power operates and who wields it: [ Link ]
parzival · 2026-08-13T05:19:13Z 'Encore at the Cirque Du Hormuz - The Greatest Show on Earth!' by Simplicius Aug 12, 2026 [ Link ] . "...The state of affairs is breathtaking, to say the least. The US Navy operating against Iran continues to leave observers awestruck amidst new reports of sailors literally trying to jump off the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier:..."
parzival · 2026-08-13T05:19:13Z
'Encore at the Cirque Du Hormuz - The Greatest Show on Earth!' by Simplicius Aug 12, 2026 [ Link ] . "...The state of affairs is breathtaking, to say the least. The US Navy operating against Iran continues to leave observers awestruck amidst new reports of sailors literally trying to jump off the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier:..."
TBoris · 2026-08-13T10:56:32Z parzival I wouldn't be surprised if there was CIA "MKULTRA" like experiments being conducted on the carrier...
parzival I wouldn't be surprised if there was CIA "MKULTRA" like experiments being conducted on the carrier...
parzival · TBoris · 2026-08-14T01:14:38Z
TBoris · 2026-08-14T10:30:36Z parzival Isn't that bad?
parzival · 2026-08-15T13:08:18Z TBoris It surely isn't good...
parzival · 2026-08-15T13:08:18Z
TBoris It surely isn't good...
parzival · 2026-08-26T06:05:27Z '9/11 Remembered: 25th Anniversary Edition' An Anthology for 9/11 Truthers (August 15, 2026).by Ronin Aug 15, 2026 [ Link ]
parzival · 2026-08-26T06:05:27Z
'9/11 Remembered: 25th Anniversary Edition' An Anthology for 9/11 Truthers (August 15, 2026).by Ronin Aug 15, 2026 [ Link ]